Unite ballots 700 Aberdeen council workers over alleged ‘fire and rehire’ proposals

The council has tabled a proposal to unilaterally impose a cut of two hours in the working week to 35-hours.
1 min read

Over 700 workers at Aberdeen City Council are being balloted on strike action over alleged ‘fire and re-hire’ proposals, according to Unite.

The council has tabled a proposal to impose a cut of two hours in the working week to 35-hours.

The proposal, if enacted, could potentially cut workers’ wages by up to 104 hours per year, impacting over 3,000 workers in one of Scotland’s largest councils.

Unite said that widespread industrial action would lead to a significant reduction in provision for some of the city’s most vital services. 

The ballot opens today and closes on 14th April.

Sharon Graham, general secretary at Unite, said: “Aberdeen council’s incendiary fire and rehire plans are disgraceful and must immediately be taken off the table.

“It is a callous attempt to demolish pay and conditions for some of the lowest paid workers in Aberdeen.

“Unite will resist this with every single tool at our disposal including extensive industrial action if necessary.”

Vic Fraser, industrial officer at Unite, said: “The fire and rehire plans by Aberdeen council need to be ditched or strike action will lead to services grinding to a halt.

“If that happens, the blame will lie exclusively with councillors and council officials. The use of fire and rehire breaches the fair work principles.

“The Scottish Government must intervene and clearly tell Aberdeen council to withdraw the proposal or face sanctions.

“The failure by Government ministers to act, so far, is evidence that they are simply trying to ignore this issue.

“Unite will do everything politically, industrially, and legally possible to make sure our members are not ignored, and we will hold this rogue employer to account.”

An Aberdeen City Council spokesperson said: “Constructive discussions are continuing with Trade Unions, through ongoing formal consultation meetings, where our desired outcome is to reach agreement.

“Dismissal and re-engagement has not been suggested by the Council during any consultation, engagement or discussions that have been taking place.  

“Whilst it is one possible lawful route to implementing a contractual change, the Council would not consider dismissal and re-engagement without having exhausted all possible other routes.

“The goal is to reach an agreement through this consultation process with employees and trade unions, whose feedback has already improved and amended the original proposal.” 

Zarah Choudhary

Zarah Choudhary is a Reporter for Workplace Journal and The Intermediary

Previous Story

Women could lose £12,554 in pension savings due to maternity leave contribution gaps

Next Story

12 care companies threaten to withdraw services in Leeds amid financial dispute

Latest from Employee Relations

RedArc urges early intervention as modern life drives rise in mental health challenges

RedArc has highlighted the growing strain on mental health caused by modern-day pressures such as heavy workloads, family demands, social media, and global uncertainty. The organisation said these factors are fuelling demand for mental health support and increasing the prevalence of serious mental health conditions. According to figures from Rethink Mental Illness, individuals are eight times more likely to wait more than 18 months for publicly funded mental health treatment than for physical health care. RedArc warned that delays in accessing help can lead to deterioration and long-term consequences for individuals’ wellbeing. The company stressed that timely intervention can lead

Don't Miss