UK Supreme Court rules against disciplining staff for legal strike action

UK Supreme Court decision protects employees from being disciplined for participating in legal strike action.
1 min read

The UK Supreme Court has determined that employers cannot discipline employees for engaging in legal strike action, following a case brought by UNISON on behalf of care worker Fiona Mercer. This decision mandates government action to modify existing legislation to ensure fair treatment for employees.

UNISON took the issue to the Supreme Court to challenge a Court of Appeal decision that it said left striking workers unprotected and the UK in violation of international law.

Christina McAnea, UNISON’s general secretary, remarked on the ruling: “This is the most important industrial action case for decades. It’s a victory for every employee who might one day want to challenge something bad or unfair their employer has done.”

Fiona Mercer, directly affected by the previous lack of protection, stated: “I’m delighted at today’s outcome. Although it won’t change the way I was treated, it means irresponsible employers will now think twice before behaving badly towards their unhappy staff.”

Ryan Fowler

Ryan Fowler is the Managing Director of Astor Media and Publisher of Workplace Journal

Previous Story

Glasgow’s 13th Note staff triumph in tribunal over abrupt redundancies

Next Story

Survey reveals UK workers’ discomfort with AI in HR

Latest from Employee Relations

92% of workers say job titles are used to fake career growth, research reveals

A new survey found that employers are increasingly using inflated job titles to give the illusion of advancement – without raises, promotions, or added benefits – leaving many workers feeling misled and undervalued. According to the Title Inflation Report from MyPerfectResume®, which surveyed 1,000 workers, 92% believed companies use job titles to fake career growth. The findings painted a picture of widespread ‘title inflation’, where lofty labels mask stagnant pay and stalled progression. More than one-third of respondents said they’ve received a senior-sounding title without a pay increase, while 38% said their title made their role appear more advanced than

Don't Miss