Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT

Menzies LLP advises businesses to prepare for higher staffing costs under zero-hour proposals

This comes as retailers have raised concerns that Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s plans will make it harder to hire for flexible and youth roles.

Menzies LLP advises businesses to prepare for higher staffing costs under zero-hour proposals
ADVERTISEMENT

Willorna Brock, senior HR consultant at accountancy and business advisory firm Menzies LLP, has advised businesses to prepare for higher staffing costs and more paperwork if proposals to tighten rules on zero-hours contracts go ahead. 

This comes as retailers have raised concerns that Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s plans will make it harder to hire for flexible and youth roles. 

Government research found Labour’s proposals for guaranteed-hour contracts and paying for cancelled shifts could cost UK businesses nearly £3bn a year. 

This is expected to add to the compliance burden for retail, hospitality and leisure firms in the South and across the country, which are already facing falling consumer demand.

Brock said: “Government proposals on guaranteed hours and reasonable notice of shift changes have been priced at around £2.9bn a year, and the largest component comes from paying for shifts cancelled at short notice rather than from guaranteed hours. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“In Britain’s retail, hospitality and leisure sectors, where trade differs daily, a notice requirement of up to a month asks employers to predict demand with little room to adjust when it shifts, turning the routine judgement to trim a rota for a quiet week into a legislated payment obligation. 

“Greater security for workers is welcome, but these policies risk leaving employers carrying higher fixed staffing costs through quieter periods while running short-handed at their busiest, with the administrative burden of evidencing each change falling on businesses already short of time, resource and headspace.”

Brock added: “Employers are therefore likely to become more cautious about recruitment, particularly for entry-level, part-time and seasonal roles. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Certain groups of employees such as students and workers with caring responsibilities value and rely on flexible employment, so a move towards permanent contracts would mean fewer opportunities in sectors that have traditionally provided a financial lifeline for these groups.

“For SMEs specifically, these proposals land alongside higher wage bills, National Insurance costs, skills shortages and supply chain pressures, and on top of preparations for the Employment Rights Act 2025 and the reforms that follow it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

She said: “Where variable-hours workforces are large, additional employment costs could absorb most of the relief that permanently lower business rates multipliers are due to deliver from April.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With unemployment rates remaining high, the challenge for Whitehall is setting thresholds and exemptions that retain enough flexibility for businesses to meet consumer demand and seasonal trends without pricing employees out of work. 

“Getting that balance right depends on continued and personal consultation with the businesses, people and sectors most affected by policy changes.”