Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT

Almost two-thirds of employers use AI to reject candidates before human review, study finds

Dr Jasmine Escalera said: “For workers, the growing use of AI means more career decisions may be happening before they ever have a chance to explain their experience, potential, or circumstances."

Human working with artificial intelligence to unlock work potential. AI agent support task like data analysis, Smart planning, Real time decision making, Future of efficient workplace operation.
ADVERTISEMENT

Almost two-thirds (65%) of US employers using artificial intelligence (AI) in recruitment said the technology automatically rejects candidates before they are reviewed by a person, according to research from MyPerfectResume.

The survey of 1,000 US employers involved in hiring and workforce decisions found that 26% said AI rejected between 1% and 25% of applicants, while 25% put the proportion at between 26% and 50%.

A further 11% said between 51% and 75% of applicants were rejected automatically, while 5% said AI did not reject any candidates before human review.

However, 47% of employers said AI had filtered out candidates they would otherwise have progressed, raising questions around the accuracy of automated recruitment decisions.

AI is also increasingly being used beyond recruitment, with 52% of employers using the technology to support workforce planning decisions, including restructuring and assessing role redundancies.

ADVERTISEMENT

A further 28% were considering doing so.

Confidence in its fairness was mixed, with 51% of employers saying they were confident AI was being used fairly in layoffs, compared with 23% who expressed doubts. The remaining 26% did not use AI in layoff decisions.

The research also found that 51% of employers used AI to identify candidates considered “risky”, including those with career gaps or histories of frequently changing jobs, with another 12% considering doing so.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite concerns around automated filtering, 57% of employers said AI had improved hiring outcomes, while 16% reported no noticeable impact and 4% said outcomes had worsened.

More than a quarter (28%) said AI had increased diversity, compared with 19% who reported a decrease and 31% who said it had made no difference.

ADVERTISEMENT

AI was most commonly used for resume screening, cited by 42% of employers, followed by interview scheduling and background checks at 35% each, skills assessments at 33% and candidate sourcing at 28%.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr Jasmine Escalera, career expert at MyPerfectResume, said: “For workers, the growing use of AI means more career decisions may be happening before they ever have a chance to explain their experience, potential, or circumstances.

“When AI is screening out candidates, flagging career gaps or job changes as risks, and influencing decisions about layoffs or restructuring, workers may be judged by patterns in their resumes rather than the full context of their careers.

“Employers have a responsibility to make sure these tools do not replace human judgment, especially when the outcome can determine whether someone gets an opportunity, advances in their career, or keeps their job.”