From human-in-the-loop to human-on-the-loop: The new leadership skill gap
Orla Daly discusses why leaders must develop stronger oversight and governance skills as AI takes on a greater role in the workplace.

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more autonomous, with 50% of business decisions predicted to be augmented or automated by AI agents next year, human roles are shifting away from execution and toward oversight. Humans are moving from ‘in-the-loop’ to ‘on-the-loop’, where they are no longer involved in every decision, but instead oversee outcomes, define guardrails, and step in when risk or accountability demands it.
This shift creates a new leadership challenge: knowing when to intervene, when to trust the system, and how to ensure accountability remains firmly with humans. Closing this gap requires more than AI adoption; it demands a new leadership capability built around judgment, governance and outcome-based decision-making.
Why technical competence alone is no longer enough
For years, technical expertise defined capability and credibility in the workplace, particularly within technical and specialist teams. While employees knowledge effectively on the job, it was technical proficiency that underpinned confidence, performance and career progression.
That expertise has now been devalued due to the growing accessibility and autonomy of AI tools within organisations. Employees across functions can now leverage AI regardless of their technical background, and develop similar AI solutionsThe result is a workplace where technical competence is no longer enough.
What matters now is how effectively those capabilities are applied through judgment, oversight and decision-making under uncertainty. Organisations that continue to prioritise technical skills or AI adoption as a technology priority in isolation risk creating AI-driven workflows that reinforce sub optimal processes rather than improve outcomes.
At the same time, trust in AI cannot be built passively. If employees are not encouraged to engage with AI early, through experimentation, interaction and practical applications, confidence in both the technology and leadership’s ability to govern it effectively begins to erode. When responsible decision-making is not built into workflows, with one mistake, adoption slows and scepticism grows.
The rise of on-the-loop leaders










