Nearly six in 10 firms unprepared for incoming AML regulation changes, VinciWorks finds
A survey of 334 compliance professionals across the legal, financial services and accounting sectors found that 57% of firms have either not started preparing for the 2026 amendments.
More than half of regulated firms have yet to prepare for incoming changes to money laundering regulations expected to come into force later this summer, according to research from VinciWorks.
A survey of 334 compliance professionals across the legal, financial services and accounting sectors found that 57% of firms have either not started preparing for the 2026 amendments to the Money Laundering Regulations or are unsure of their current position.
Just 4% said new policies were already in place.
The Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Regulations 2026 were laid before Parliament on 25th March and are expected to come into force in late June or early July, with most changes taking effect around 21 days after approval.
The research also highlighted a gap between firms’ confidence in their compliance processes and their actual preparedness for the changes.
While 77% of respondents said they were fairly or very confident their AML training could quickly adapt to the new regulations, only 4% had updated policies ready to implement. Around 38% said preparation work had started, while 26% had not yet begun.
Nick Henderson-Mayo, head of compliance at VinciWorks, said: “The confidence figures look reassuring until you set them alongside the readiness data.
“Three-quarters of compliance professionals believe their training can adapt quickly, but fewer than one in twenty have policies ready to go. That gap could be where firms get caught.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He added: “Regulators do not accept good intentions as a defence. They look for evidence of what was in place, when it was updated, and whether staff actually understood it.
“With these regulations potentially coming into force in the coming weeks, the window to act is short.”
The survey also found that 13% of firms have no clear position on cryptocurrency exposure despite the amendments including provisions relating to digital assets.
Meanwhile, 43% said they treat all cryptocurrency transactions as high risk for AML purposes, while 23% assess crypto risk on a case-by-case basis.
Ruth Mittelmann-Cohen, head of legal compliance at VinciWorks, said: “Crypto is a significant concern even for firms without specific exposure, and the 2026 amendments reflect that.
“Firms that still have no clear position on how they treat crypto are leaving a visible gap in their risk framework.
“Firms need to be ready to assess crypto risk in source of wealth and funds checks, as well as consider the risk of tax evasion concerns unless the cryptocurrency in question has a proper audit trail behind it.”
Client and customer risk assessments were identified as the biggest area of paper compliance risk by 31% of respondents, while 28% pointed to source of funds and source of wealth evidence.
Henderson-Mayo concluded: “Paper compliance is one of the most persistent problems in AML. Firms produce policies that look thorough on paper but bear no resemblance to what fee earners are actually doing.
“The 2026 amendments, with their emphasis on professional judgment and documented reasoning rather than tick-box escalation, will make that drift much harder to hide.
“If your written policy says one thing and your files show another, the regulator could notice.”