Why I will not be celebrating International Women’s Day
Averil Leimon discusses the real work that must be done to support women in the workplace.
I will not be taking part in this year’s festivities on 8th March.
Usually, I am giving a speech somewhere – unpaid, because after all it is women’s work – watching lots of virtue signalling, while reading about what the numbers actually tell us in the companies crowing about their success.
On Saturday 8th March, I shall instead be landing in Rwanda. Plans include shopping at a women’s cooperative that is doing a great deal to support women in business, meeting and encouraging women building their own careers to provide for and improve the lives of their families and their country. Somehow, it feels more real.
So why am I, an incorrigible optimist, feeling curmudgeonly about International Women’s Day (IWD)? Well, I’m fed up pointing out that, at 51% of the adult population, women are neither a minority nor very diverse – except from each other. What we are, instead, is much more aligned with younger generations and all other diversities. Whatever benefits women, benefits the majority of those people deemed ‘different’ from the ones who have held the power and the finances for generations.
My first ever big speech was for the Glasgow Herald bicentenary. We, the panel, argued for 50% representation in business and politics. This isn’t exactly a groundbreaking statement, I hear you say, plenty of women call for it every day. But that speech took place in 1983! I have the newspaper cutting, or I wouldn’t believe it myself.
Here I am still talking about it – boring you, boring me. We have moved at glacial speed in employing the entire talent pool more effectively, treating women with equity.
Research shows incontrovertibly that having a diverse workforce is good for business, yet real results are slow to change. Why are some firms failing?
I co-wrote the book ‘Coaching Women to Lead’, following research with the London School of Economics (LSE) in 2011, then the second edition in 2020. In the intervening time, some things had changed. This was mainly the number of people with ‘diversity’ in their job titles, the number of policies written, and yes, the number of women on boards – albeit non-execs, or the same women on a range of boards. But had things really changed in the real world? And if not, why not?












