Culture, cost and confusion are stopping school leaders taking phased retirement
The survey of more than 500 school leaders aged 50 and older found more than half (53%) would consider taking phased retirement, but almost a third (30%) of them don’t believe it will be possible.
New research from TeacherTapp commissioned by Wesleyan Financial Services has uncovered why headteachers aren’t making the most of phased retirement.
The survey of more than 500 school leaders aged 50 and older found more than half (53%) would consider taking phased retirement, but almost a third (30%) of them don’t believe it will be possible.
Men (65%) are more likely to be considering phased retirement than women (50%), but are also more likely (35% vs. 28% of women) to think it’s not possible.
When asked why they thought most teachers chose to retire fully, more than a third of headteachers and senior educators said phased retirement options were unclear and not talked about (37%). They also said current school budgets don’t allow for school leaders to use phased retirement options (15%), and that there is a culture in the profession that frowns upon phased retirement being taken (14%).
Marginally more women (39%) than men (30%) felt that phased retirement options were unclear and not talked about, while more men (21%) than women (12%) felt there was a culture that frowns upon school leaders taking phased retirement.
Despite this, Wesleyan found that school leaders recognise the benefits that phased retirement can offer, with just 15% wanting to fully retire from the profession. They include enabling them to continue working while avoiding burnout (39%), phase into retirement while retaining a sense of purpose and routine (29%) and supporting more effective succession planning at their school (21%).
The research comes as the latest figures from the government’s School Workforce Census (SWC)[1] show teacher vacancies in England increased by 20% during 2023.
Darren Mills, Specialist Financial Adviser at Wesleyan Financial Services, said: “With both the main political parties campaigning on pledges to recruit and retain more teachers, encouraging phased retirement would be an effective way of keeping experienced senior leaders in the profession for longer.











